Some links on this site are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Learn more
Home / Compare / OpenAI Codex vs Cline

OpenAI Codex vs Cline (2026)

Pricing, features and who each one is for, checked against both vendors' pricing pages in November 2026.

Quick verdict: These solve different jobs: OpenAI Codex is a coding agent (cloud, cli, ide), Cline is a open-source coding agent. Many developers use one of each. Cline is cheaper to start (free (pay for inference)). Pick OpenAI Codex for professional developers, AI coding agents for the terminal, teams. Pick Cline for open-source AI coding tools, cheap and free AI coding tools, professional developers.

Try OpenAI CodexTry Cline

Affiliate disclosure: some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up through them we may earn a commission, at no additional cost to you. It never changes our verdicts. How this works.

Side by side

OpenAI CodexCline
TypeCoding agent (cloud, CLI, IDE)Open-source coding agent
Made byOpenAICline Bot Inc.
Free tierNoYes
Starts atFrom $20/moFree (pay for inference)
PlansIncluded in ChatGPT Plus $20/mo, Pro $100/mo, Business $20/user/mo (2+ seats, annual)Free and open source for individuals; pay only for model inference (or bring your own API key). Enterprise custom
Open sourceNoYes
Runs inCloud, CLI, IDE extension, ChatGPT appVS Code extension, CLI, SDK

OpenAI Codex strengths

  • Included with ChatGPT plans you may already pay for
  • Parallel cloud agents that keep running when you close your laptop
  • Automatic PR review

Cline strengths

  • No subscription or seat fees
  • Any model provider, no lock-in
  • MCP marketplace and client-side architecture

OpenAI Codex drawbacks

  • Usage caps on Plus are aimed at focused sessions
  • Best experience assumes a ChatGPT account and GitHub repos

Cline drawbacks

  • Costs vary with how much inference you burn
  • JetBrains extension and SSO are Enterprise-only

Read the full reviews: OpenAI Codex · Cline